Skip to main content

CARE Gender Toolkit

Go Search
CARE Gender Toolkit
WEIMI Guide
Program Cycle
Gender Analysis Framework
Analysis Preparation
Features
  
CARE Gender Toolkit > Pages > quantitative analysis-participatory numbers  


tools for analysis
Quantitative analysis & Participatory Numbers

While most studies described on this site have engaged the qualitative analysis methods, a number of teams have engaged quantitative or mixed-methods analysis to describe the present situations facing groups at a particular point in time (cross-sectional) or across time (longitudinal).

Quantitative methods can produce results that are easy to interpret, though issues of translation and cross-cultural communication can pose challenges to the study and its results.

 

 Methods

Aspects of quantitative analysis include:

  • Sampling and selection (click link for further discussion)
  • Tools for collecting data
  • Data management
  • Analysis methods

In addition, this page also touches on how some teams have engaged participatory numbers to aggregate or count information gathered through qualitative and participatory approaches.

 

Sources of Data

For quantitative analysis, sources of information can come from a spectrum of methods, which include:

 

Data Management: to ensure quality of information gathered, a data management plan must be in place. The plan should outline objectives of the study, the hypothesis being explored, variables to be explored and plans for analyzing the study objective.

For quantitative analysis, data management should have

A tested and reliable codebook: that labels each question, and values for each response

A system to treat missing data and to clean data: Where responses are missing, teams may return to respondents for follow-up, or provide a code (i.e. 99) for blank answers. It may be helpful to analyze how frequently answers are missing for each question. For variables where levels of missing information are significant, it may be worth exploring patterns across respondents to identify patterns around who do or do not respond to these questions. Cleaning data also includes an analysis of data to identify missing or potential issues with outliers, deciding how to treat missing data, etc.

Clear and detailed documentation on data management: cleaning, treatment of missing data, and how indices are developed (i.e. a variable on consumption may = food expenditures + housing + education costs)

 

Quantitative methods to analyze data include:

Descriptive Measures: mean, median, spread (range, standard deviation, variance).

Comparing data across groups: differences in specific variable values (outcomes or processes /behaviors) between different groups. Within CARE, use of comparison has been used to compare between groups of people, as well as to compare how certain variables have changed over time within a community: 

  • For evaluation or impact measurement, studies may engage communities or groups which CARE has engaged at varying levels. This may include:
    • Women and their households who have had varying levels of engagement with CARE projects
    • Time (if information from baseline studies could be mined to identify change in women’s empowerment)
    • Control groups through ‘desk controls’ or evidence from similar zones where CARE does not work through reports, interviews with informants from other organizations, etc.
  • In situational analysis, studies use comparison to understand the varying realities across richer, poorer or excluded village communities.

Estimating the correlations between variables:

  • 2 variables: cross-tabulation, chi-square, scattergrams, correlation coefficients, analysis of covariance
  • 3+ variables: three-variable contingency tables, partial correlations, multiple regression

Given the myriad of variables that exist, studies can only assert associations between variables, and not causality.

 

Participatory Numbers

To adapt methods more closely with the context of specific communities, as well as engage more empowering methods, participatory numbers have also been gathered through a spectrum of participatory approaches (see Chambers, 2005):

Other methods for collecting participatory numbers may be through trend and change analysis, seasonal diagramming, scoring, mapping, well-being analysis, etc. Information from these exercises can also be counted and aggregated. However, this approach makes it more difficult to be able to compare across sites, or understand changes in a more generalized fashion.

 PARTICIPATORY Numbers Example

In addition to closed questionnaires, CARE Ethiopia used participatory numbers by aggregating responses across focus group discussions to understand respondent views about:

  • Civil society and political participation
  • Gender attitudes
  • Definitions of empowerment
  • Rights, justice and equity
  • Inheritance
  • Female genital cutting
  • Education
  • Marriage
  • Household decision-making
  • Mobility
  • Changes
  • Access to health services
Download an example of Participatory Number Tables (Section B) in CARE Ethiopia's SII Report. 

 Resources

  • T Klouda (2008). Links between ‘Empowerment’ and HIV Risk. CARE USA. Available at Module 7 of CARE’s Women’s Empowerment Strategic Impact Inquiry Methodological Compendium: http://pqdl.care.org/sii/pages/methods.aspx.
  • CARE (2007). Gender, Sex and the Power to Survive: the impact and implications of empowering women at risk of HIV and AIDS, Global Research Design Framework. Available at Module 4 of CARE’s Women’s Empowerment Strategic Impact Inquiry Methodological Compendium: http://pqdl.care.org/sii/pages/methods.aspx.
  • M Bamberger, J Rugh and L Mabry (2006). RealWorld: Evlauation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • CARE (2006). Global Research Framework for CARE’s Strategic Impact Inquiry on Women’s Empowerment. Available at the Overview page of CARE’s Women’s Empowerment Strategic Impact Inquiry Library: http://pqdl.care.org/sii/Pages/overview.aspx.
  • CARE Ethiopia (2006). Strategic Impact Inquiry on Women’s Empowerment in Relation to FGC Elimination Project in Awash. Available at CARE’s Women’s Empowerment Strategic Impact Inquiry Library: http://pqdl.care.org/sii/SIILibrary/Forms/Africa.aspx.
  • CARE India (2006). Strategic Impact Inquiry: Sustainable Tribal Empowerment Project. Available at CARE’s Women’s Empowerment Strategic Impact Inquiry Library: http://pqdl.care.org/sii/SIILibrary/Forms/Asia.aspx.
  • F Wamara (2006). Strategic Impact Inquiry Quantitative Field Survey: Magu District’s VSLA Groups Field Completion Report. CARE International – Tanzania. Available at Module 4 of CARE’s Women’s Empowerment Strategic Impact Inquiry Methodological Compendium: http://pqdl.care.org/sii/pages/methods.aspx.
  • N Kanji, B Bode and A Haq (2006): Strategic Impact Inquiry: CARE Bangladesh Nijeder Janyia Nijera. Available at CARE’s Women’s Empowerment Strategic Impact Inquiry Library: http://pqdl.care.org/sii/SIILibrary/Forms/Asia.aspx.
  • F Maiga (2006). Etude SII – Questionnaire Individuel Femme. CARE International – Mali.
  • R Chambers (2005). Participation and Numbers. Q-Squared Working Paper, No. 13. Toronto: Center for International Studies.
  • T Barton (1998). Program Impact Evaluation Process: M&E Tool Box. CARE International – Uganda. Available at: http://pqdl.care.org/pages/practice.aspx.